Patents. Protection for your New or Improved Product or Process.
Document Actions

Frequently cited patent cases

When making hearing submissions, the Commissioner does not require copies of the following cases:

  • Saxpack Foods Limited v J Wattie Canneries Limited, unreported, No M454/85, 11 July 1998
  • The General Tire & Rubber Co v The Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co Ltd [1972] RPC 457
  • NZPO Practice Note, published in Patent Office Journal No.1287, July 1986
  • Beecham Group Ltd v Bristol Myers Co (No 2) [1980] 1 NZLR 192
  • Windsurfing International Inc. v Tabur Marine (Great Britain) Ltd [1985] RPC 59
  • Smale v North Sails Ltd [1991] 3 NZLR 19
  • Noton New Zealand Ltd v Allistair Bevin Ltd (1979) 1 NZIPR 236
  • International Business Machines Corp’s Application [1970] RPC 533
  • NZPO Practice Note, published in Patent Office Journal No.1367, 28 April 1993
  • National Research Development Corp v Commissioner of Patents (1959) CLR 252
  • R v Patents Appeal Tribunal (ex parte Swift & Co.) [1962] RPC 37
  • Ancare New Zealand Ltd v Cyanamid of NZ Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 299
  • Mond Nickel Coy. Ld.’s Application [1956] RPC 189

 

In addition, any IPONZ decisions that are available on NZLII do not need to be supplied with the hearing submissions.

 

Last updated 11 August 2010

igovt log on

New to IPONZ?

about our services
how long will it take?