Ministry of Economic Development Home
Trade marks. Protect brands, identity & logos.
Document Actions

7.1 Convincing IPONZ deception or confusion is unlikely

Up one level

Where a citation has been raised under section 25(1)(b) of the Act, an applicant may be able to convince IPONZ that the co-existence of the applicant’s mark with the cited mark is not likely to deceive or confuse. For example, an applicant may argue:

  • That their mark is not similar to the cited mark.
  • That their goods/services are not the same as, or similar to, the goods/services of the cited mark.

The applicant must make their submissions in writing.


View whole section on one page

Last updated 16 November 2009